Cathleen, I’m not going to introduce myself, since I have already done that a while back on the main board. I use this site to gain information about the 102 I own. As a 43 year old father of three, I don’t have time to post. However, this thread, along with the other which spurred this one, just gets me going. I don’t think the thread is boring……..but, from my point of view, it’s unnecessary. I live in a primary rural area, and quite frankly, the folks that live in the areas with the tall buildings may need better gun control (from their point of view). But, we don’t out here where the corn grows.
The current gun laws are largely not enforced and the criminals don’t obey them anyway. The left feels that anything which can be done to save just one life (or anything for the kids) is justifiable, except for the unborn, or course (they have no rights). But as far as the gun control debate, what about my rights? The word which needs to be defined in this thread is “infringed”.
I’m not some gun-toting lunatic that believes that anything goes when it comes to guns. Sure, we need to close the gun show loop-hole, but I will staunchly oppose any legislation which will implement a gun owner registry and/or legislation which attempts to require back-ground checks for person to person sales. That’s not necessary. The NRA opposes most everything because they know that if you give the government an inch, they take a mile……and they’re right. An assault weapon ban is just stupid. By definition my Marlin Model 60 .22 rifle (semi-automatic, 18 shot tube magazine) is an assault weapon. The last time assault weapons were banned, it didn’t change a thing. It just makes liberals feel good, because for some reason they think the 2nd amendment was created to allow me to deer hunt. The 2nd amendment is a check in the system to stop the government when it decides to employ its tyrannical tendencies. The high-capacity magazine is just another way a non-user of firearms would like to try to provide control. You ask why anyone feels they need clips (you mean magazines) that hold more than ten rounds? You state I should be able to hit my target, enemy (home invader), or bear in ten shots. It’s a PITA to constantly be reloading magazines when I’m target shooting (especially with the high range fees these days), home invaders don’t just come one at a time, and the dogs, fox, and coyotes that attack my livestock typically come at night in large packs. I won’t even get into the reasons why I’d want a large magazine when I have to fight the government when they come for my firearms.
The NRA’s idea about protecting our children by providing armed security in schools is not a stupid idea. But, like I said above, non-users of firearms get scared when a firearm is around children. Hey, how about this idea……let’s make firearm safety a requirement in schools. Educators seem to think its ok to teach sex education, the gay and lesbian lifestyle, and evolution (but not creation) to elementary students. Why can’t we teach them how to safely and properly handle a firearm?
My beliefs by now should be clear. But, I get tired of the same argument. It is clear that you, Cathleen, have your beliefs, and this post will not change them. But, you’re not going to change mine, either. Therefore, I don’t believe there needs to be a solution to a problem that doesn’t exist. My right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. It is clear in the constitution. There might be a problem that needs to be fixed because certain individuals choose to use firearms to shoot people, but the solutions thus far are trampling on my right. Find another solution.
Respectfully,
Kirk