D
dvogt
Guest
I think they made a turbo version
-
This community needs YOUR help today!
With the ever-increasing fees of maintaining our vibrant community (servers, software, domains, email), we need help.
We need more Supporting Members today.Please invest back into this community to help spread our love and knowledge of all aspects of IH Cub Cadet and other garden tractors.
Why Join?
- Exclusive Access: Gain entry to private forums.
- Special Perks: Enjoy enhanced account features that enrich your experience, including the ability to disable ads.
- Free Gifts: Sign up annually and receive exclusive IH Cub Cadet Tractor Forum decals directly to your door!
This is your chance to make a difference. Become a Supporting Member today:
Archive through November 13, 2004
- Thread starter kweaver
- Start date
Help Support IH Cub Cadet Forum:
Rob D,
I know IH offered an optional electric lift for the 127, but I've never seen a side hydraulic put on one, but anything should be possible. ;-P
I know IH offered an optional electric lift for the 127, but I've never seen a side hydraulic put on one, but anything should be possible. ;-P
Charlie the reason I'm considering a hyd lift is because everyone that I talk to says that the electric lifts are unreliable. I don't know much about either lift, but I do know after tilling 5-6 gardens my right arm is toast...
Rob, it should fit just fine.
Billy Burroughs has one on his 126 which is from the same series as your 127 except it's a gear drive.
(Message edited by kmcconaughey on November 15, 2004)
Billy Burroughs has one on his 126 which is from the same series as your 127 except it's a gear drive.
(Message edited by kmcconaughey on November 15, 2004)
Rob D,
Personally I really like the electric lift as it gives me more up/down control without the jerky movement found with hydraulic lifts, especially when you have the RPM's at full bore. I till on average, 7,000 ft. a year and wouldn't put the tiller on anything but electric. But that's just me.
Personally I really like the electric lift as it gives me more up/down control without the jerky movement found with hydraulic lifts, especially when you have the RPM's at full bore. I till on average, 7,000 ft. a year and wouldn't put the tiller on anything but electric. But that's just me.
sblunier
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2006
- Messages
- 4,829
- displayname
- Steve Blunier "Mr. Plow" (Central IL)
Rob,
The electric may work well, as Charlie stated, for tillers, BUT I find them too slow and (usually) underpowered, for things like blades, blowers, etc....especially with heavy and repetitive use (like plowing the whole neighborhood out of a big snow). Dad has an electric on his tiller, and it's ok for that, but would be very annoying for the other tasks I mentioned.....too slow.
The hyd. unit will probably require less work/maintenance over the long haul and will probably have more lifting power.
The electric may work well, as Charlie stated, for tillers, BUT I find them too slow and (usually) underpowered, for things like blades, blowers, etc....especially with heavy and repetitive use (like plowing the whole neighborhood out of a big snow). Dad has an electric on his tiller, and it's ok for that, but would be very annoying for the other tasks I mentioned.....too slow.
The hyd. unit will probably require less work/maintenance over the long haul and will probably have more lifting power.
Rob D,
For you! I'd say go hydraulic, either way you won't regret it for a minute.
Course after I got used to it, throwin snow was kinda cool too with the 147, course I'm always slow!
For you! I'd say go hydraulic, either way you won't regret it for a minute.
Course after I got used to it, throwin snow was kinda cool too with the 147, course I'm always slow!
John, on that version the gauge wheels were optional. It should have a cover on the left side though. That version was for the the 1x8/9 series.
(Message edited by kmcconaughey on November 15, 2004)
(Message edited by kmcconaughey on November 15, 2004)
<blockquote><hr size=0><!-quote-!><font size=1>quote:</font>
More posts & e-mails will just slow us down<!-/quote-!><hr size=0></blockquote>
Ummm, I don't think thats got anything to do with it!
More posts & e-mails will just slow us down<!-/quote-!><hr size=0></blockquote>
Ummm, I don't think thats got anything to do with it!
Thank's Kraig, the reason I asked is there is some confusion about which model it is. A dealer told me it's the wrong one for my 109. I see some have round runners and others more flat shaped. Mine came with 1 of each.
The picture in the owners manual shows the flat runners. Yet a parts list I have has round ones. Just wondering if there is any real difference between the two.
John
John
Does anyone have any opinions on this?
I built this earlier this spring.
I just ordered another valve and cylinder to remove the manual lift arm and replace with a hydralic lift.
The tractor originally came with the electric lift.
BTW you can buy an electric lift new from Duff Norton for about $280 if anyone is interested.
I built this earlier this spring.
I just ordered another valve and cylinder to remove the manual lift arm and replace with a hydralic lift.
The tractor originally came with the electric lift.
BTW you can buy an electric lift new from Duff Norton for about $280 if anyone is interested.
jmacdonald
Well-known member
Mark wrote "I bought a gas tank through ebay and it was supposed to fit all older styles. When I received it, it wouldn't fit. The dimensions are 5x6.25x12.75 and looks like it is for the 104, 105, 106, 107 and maybe the 100 and 102, I can't tell from the parts manual. I think the part number is either a KH230048 or KH235370. Can anyone help?"
Mark I don't have any dimentions, but in the TC-133 parts catalog that part number KH-235370 does fit a 102,104,105,106,and 107. The model 100 shows a KH230164. I thumbed through manual, but did not see KH230048.
Hope this helps.
jimmac
Mark I don't have any dimentions, but in the TC-133 parts catalog that part number KH-235370 does fit a 102,104,105,106,and 107. The model 100 shows a KH230164. I thumbed through manual, but did not see KH230048.
Hope this helps.
jimmac
