Lewis & Marty, I finally got off my duff and went out to my 122 (which is in pieces) and found my red wire:
Lewis, I think you are correct, the 122 Wiring Diagram is wrong, but . . .
I also think we're asking more out of the schematic than it really wants to give.
I'm not sure, but I think what we're dealing with here is the sometimes subtle differences between a wiring schematic and a wiring diagram. As one of the textbooks I use states it, to the best of my memory, a wiring schematic is keen to show the logical relationship between components; where a wiring diagram is keen to show you their physical location.
So, for example, the logical relationship of the voltage regulator case to ground is shown in the SCHEMATIC for the Cub Cadet 1x2/3:
12
Whereas, the diagram for the 1x4/5 shows how that ground connection is made, more along the lines of a proper wiring DIAGRAM:
The change in style may have been made to clear up questions just like Marty's. A true wiring diagram would distinguish between connections made at the frame or in the cowl; in the engine bay or the battery compartment, etc.
So I no longer believe the Serial Numbers are relevant (although I wonder how you can so precisely date yours, Marty
), I think we're just dealing with different ways of interpreting, and rendering, the same data.
Lewis, I especially appreciate your input, got me looking a little closer and thinking a little bit more.
In an unrelated matter,
Scott Nicklas: Excellent post, as Mr. Blunier confirmed.
Edit: One of the strength's of Roland Bedell's renderings is that they lean a bit more toward the diagram end of the spectrum. You can clearly divide his drawings between the rear, middle, and front of the tractor.