I believe everyone is entitled to their opinion. I really think that anyone using the term semiautomatic as a negative term, needs to get to know the true meaning of the term semiautomatic. Not what the mainstream media wants to tell you. Nearly every pistol that every police officer carries is "semi-automatic". I am sure there are probably a few police that still carry a revolver (six-shooter as they used to be called). All that the term semi-automatic implies, is that every time you pull the trigger, a bullet gets shot. The anti-gun people want you to believe that the guns that were used in the recent shootings were somehow machine guns that spray bullets with a single pull of the trigger like the military has. The shotgun I received as a 13 year old (Remington 1100) is a semiautomatic. With that gun, when I go rabbit hunting, I don't have to do anything for the next shotgun shell be ready to shoot. I don't have to pull back a pump or a bolt.
A so called assault rifle as the anti-gun people want to call it, is no more than a traditional hunting rifle with cosmetic changes. It looks like a military rifle, but in essence, is not more dangerous or does not have more firepower (size of the bullets that it shoots) than the gun my grandfather used for woodchuck hunting. In fact the AR-15 that was used in the recent shootings, isn't even allowed, due to it's lack of knockdown power to be used for deer hunting in New York State. An intersting URL with info regarding what cosmetic changes make a hunting rifle, an "assault rifle" under the new laws that are trying to be enacted, can be found at this URL.
http://www.assaultweapon.info I wish I had the picture on my work computer that I wanted to post. It shows 2 identical rifles when looking at their capacity of rounds, and bullet that they both shoot. If it wasn't for the pistol grip and adjustable stock that one has, they both would be legal. Because of the cosmetic differences, one will now be illegal to own.
An interesting video of the insanity of outlawing these particular guns can be seen in this video of a expert shooter displaying the difference in the size of the holes made in a metal wall using an AR-15 along with a number of other semiautomatic guns, all of which will remain legal except for the first one she shoots.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_J_K3sUT3d4 I don't own an AR-15, nor do I ever plan on buying one, but if I do want one, I should be able to buy one. The president states that he doesn't want to take away anyones guns, yet in New York State, our lovely governor has rushed into law a ban on ANY magazine that holds more than 10 bullets. To bring it one step further, I am not allowed to even have 10 bullets in it, I can only load 7. Now, I have pistols that hold 10 and a few, manufactured before 1994, the original Assault Weapons Ban (AWB) that have 13 and 15 round magazines. Because they were manufactured before 1994, those magazines and the guns that held them were perfectly legal up until 1/14/2013. As of I believe 1/15 or 4/15 2014, it will be a crime to even own one of those magazines. The guns they are for were never designed for a 7 or 10 shot magazine. They are not even available. Also, the governor is not grandfathering any of the so-called assault weapons that again were perfectly legal last month. We have a year to sell outside of NY, any gun or magazine that doesn't fit his idea of a responsible gun.
There has been talk of wide support for background checks for all gun purchases, I'm not totally opposed to that idea. Here is the problem with that. If the guns are all registered, and the government knows who has what guns, then I as a gun owner open myself up to having my name and address posted on a website for any criminal to see, I'm of the mindset that a criminal would love to steal my guns while I am away from home, not necessarily from the standpoint that, owning a gun will act as a deterrent for someone to break into my house. How do you think the UK disarmed their citizens? It was because the government knew who "legally" owned firearms. It didn't do away with all gun crime in the UK, the criminals never turned their guns in.
I know this got a little long, and like I started this essay, everyone is entitled to their opinion. This is mine.