-
This community needs YOUR help today!
With the ever-increasing fees of maintaining our vibrant community (servers, software, domains, email), we need help.
We need more Supporting Members today.Please invest back into this community to help spread our love and knowledge of all aspects of IH Cub Cadet and other garden tractors.
Why Join?
- Exclusive Access: Gain entry to private forums.
- Special Perks: Enjoy enhanced account features that enrich your experience, including the ability to disable ads.
- Free Gifts: Sign up annually and receive exclusive IH Cub Cadet Tractor Forum decals directly to your door!
This is your chance to make a difference. Become a Supporting Member today:
Archive through January 05, 2016
- Thread starter dschwandt
- Start date
Help Support IH Cub Cadet Forum:
nbextermueller
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 18, 2007
- Messages
- 909
- displayname
- Nic Bextermueller
IF IH still built Cubs, they would either all be red and say CASE or be painted blue and say NEW HOLLAND!
And stay in the good graces... I Love CCSpecialties!
And stay in the good graces... I Love CCSpecialties!
Haha, what if?
Chances are if IH wouldn't have had to sell of CC there would be no such takeover by Tenneco, and the evolution that would have been CNH to swallow it up. Providing there wouldn't have been another strike and that the TRX program would have given worldwide commonality back to Harvester, saving quite a bit of cost. IHC would have likely still bought the Steiger plant in Fargo. It may have also been in a position to swallow up Ford New Holland in 1991 before Fiat did (and maybe leverage the distance and product between Steiger in Fargo and Versatile in Winnipeg, as well as combine operations between Rock Island and Grand Island).... so the total picture may not look that much different than what it is today, just would have put Fiat in a different bargaining position.
IHC is still alive and well in the truck and engine division. Actually, with the joint venture of CAT and IH, it's really too bad that CAT distanced itself from the Challenger line, there could have been IH power back in the field again.
Chances are if IH wouldn't have had to sell of CC there would be no such takeover by Tenneco, and the evolution that would have been CNH to swallow it up. Providing there wouldn't have been another strike and that the TRX program would have given worldwide commonality back to Harvester, saving quite a bit of cost. IHC would have likely still bought the Steiger plant in Fargo. It may have also been in a position to swallow up Ford New Holland in 1991 before Fiat did (and maybe leverage the distance and product between Steiger in Fargo and Versatile in Winnipeg, as well as combine operations between Rock Island and Grand Island).... so the total picture may not look that much different than what it is today, just would have put Fiat in a different bargaining position.
IHC is still alive and well in the truck and engine division. Actually, with the joint venture of CAT and IH, it's really too bad that CAT distanced itself from the Challenger line, there could have been IH power back in the field again.
jbaker
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2008
- Messages
- 4,144
- displayname
- jeff l baker
Amy, my first thought is what are you using the tire for primaraly such as cutting grass or pushing through snow or plowing a field or tilling gardens.
All four uses could realisticly benefit from a different type of tires.
All four uses could realisticly benefit from a different type of tires.
