Marlin, I'm struck by the common thread in both your stories --money. More money is considered better. Everything is OK if someone makes more money. In other words, THE ENDS JUSTIFY THE MEANS. It was no accident that in the New Testament, James identified the love of money as the root of all evil.
Honor and commitment --one's word is one's bond-- only mean something if both parties agree on a core set of values that place honor/trust/commitment above financial reward. Honor, truth, and commitment are intangibles, you can't eat them; money buys milk and bread, with money you eat, with more money, you can eat better --at least that's the thought.
I think there is a proverb in the Old Testament that goes something like, "A small meal with honor is better than a big spread founded on deceit" or something like that.
I wonder if the show isn't more than a soap opera, I wonder if it isn't a morality tale. The men intent on finding gold have placed themselves in a situation where their integrity is at risk.
Think about it, the possible outcomes of their adventure include:
1. They find gold and return happily to their families who embrace them
2. They find gold but they return to find their families in disarray (2-3 year follow-up show recommended)
3. They don't find gold, but their family loves them anyway and they are stronger for the experience
4. They don't find gold, and their families fall apart "as a result" (actually, the fault lines were there from the beginning, the 'Alaskan adventure' just reveals them)
They are dead set on achieving #1, pushed on by the fear of finding #4 at the end of the trail.
It will be interesting to see what happens. Once again, I'm hooked.