glippert
Well-known member
(Digger - if this is considered political, or divisive, feel free to dump it)
We haven't heard a rant from the Grump in a while, so I'm going to rant a little on my own:
What's the deal with all the whiners who don't like the airport security? Notwithstanding the obvious need to try to identify, detect, and deter those who would do harm to innocent travelers, I see no harm in taking safety precautions. Heck, I still have all the safety shields on my mower decks, tiller, snowthrower, etc. Why wouldn't I want maximum safety precautions if I want to fly somewhere?
I think the protestors forget that flying is not a right - it's a privilege. As such, those who own the process have the right and responsibility to maximize the safety and security of all their customers. The protestors do have the right to choose a different mode of travel. Cabs, buses, trains, etc., are all viable options that don't require pasenger screening to the same level as air travel. Face it, our Constitution doesn't guarantee happiness - it guarantees our right to pursue happiness. (Perhaps getting their 15 minutes of fame by protesting the process makes them happy?)
Personally, I don't forsee myself doing much more flying, but not because of the security measures. I've just flown enough and I'm at a point in my life where I don't need to get to my destinations in a hurry. I much prefer to drive and see the countryside. And, I'm 6'6" tall and legroom is a serious issue. However, if and when I do fly again, I'll gladly follow whatever safety procedures are required at that time. It's their party and I'll play by their rules! If they want me to strip naked, I will. I have nothing to be ashamed of or proud of - just what the Good Lord gave me.
OK. I feel better now. Thanks for the forum to vent. Now I'm going to get some breakfast!
We haven't heard a rant from the Grump in a while, so I'm going to rant a little on my own:
What's the deal with all the whiners who don't like the airport security? Notwithstanding the obvious need to try to identify, detect, and deter those who would do harm to innocent travelers, I see no harm in taking safety precautions. Heck, I still have all the safety shields on my mower decks, tiller, snowthrower, etc. Why wouldn't I want maximum safety precautions if I want to fly somewhere?
I think the protestors forget that flying is not a right - it's a privilege. As such, those who own the process have the right and responsibility to maximize the safety and security of all their customers. The protestors do have the right to choose a different mode of travel. Cabs, buses, trains, etc., are all viable options that don't require pasenger screening to the same level as air travel. Face it, our Constitution doesn't guarantee happiness - it guarantees our right to pursue happiness. (Perhaps getting their 15 minutes of fame by protesting the process makes them happy?)
Personally, I don't forsee myself doing much more flying, but not because of the security measures. I've just flown enough and I'm at a point in my life where I don't need to get to my destinations in a hurry. I much prefer to drive and see the countryside. And, I'm 6'6" tall and legroom is a serious issue. However, if and when I do fly again, I'll gladly follow whatever safety procedures are required at that time. It's their party and I'll play by their rules! If they want me to strip naked, I will. I have nothing to be ashamed of or proud of - just what the Good Lord gave me.
OK. I feel better now. Thanks for the forum to vent. Now I'm going to get some breakfast!