Bruce, thanks for posting the PDF. I found it very interesting.
I googled around and found this:
http://ramchargercentral.com/index.php?topic=14833.0
It discusses why porting loses power.
I suspect that for the hotrod Kohler, the biggest change was the cam. His cam probably changed the power band by transfering low end torque to high rpm power.
Back in the day for cars, they'd sell square cams in which the grind was the same for the intake and exhaust and they'd transfer the power to the upper rpm range. However, they idled really poorly from the loss of vacuum. But they had that cool idle sound. Later they realized those grinds weren't producing good power, so they developed better cam grinds. But the better cam grinds didn't produce a cool sounding idle. So what did they do, they re-introduced the square grinds for the poorer but neater sounding idle.
So my basic concern is, does that hotrod Kohler actually dyno to more power or does it just sound good???
I googled around and found this:
http://ramchargercentral.com/index.php?topic=14833.0
It discusses why porting loses power.
I suspect that for the hotrod Kohler, the biggest change was the cam. His cam probably changed the power band by transfering low end torque to high rpm power.
Back in the day for cars, they'd sell square cams in which the grind was the same for the intake and exhaust and they'd transfer the power to the upper rpm range. However, they idled really poorly from the loss of vacuum. But they had that cool idle sound. Later they realized those grinds weren't producing good power, so they developed better cam grinds. But the better cam grinds didn't produce a cool sounding idle. So what did they do, they re-introduced the square grinds for the poorer but neater sounding idle.
So my basic concern is, does that hotrod Kohler actually dyno to more power or does it just sound good???