- Joined
- Dec 3, 2005
- Messages
- 812
- displayname
- Binder 1650
QL tractor isolator question.
So I've got 8 total "good" original isolators to use when I reinstall the engine on my 1650, and I've got the cradle mod and a cast iron oil pan.
In addition to the "good" original isolators, the tractor came with a set of red/cherry looking hard rubber isolators.
It looks to me like all of the load and isolator damage occurs on the bottom isolator. So the question is - why not use the red/cherry isolator on top of the isolator bracket and the original "good" isolators on the bottom? This would save a "good" set of isolators for use another day down the road.
What about NO isolator on the top - but solid. Still have the "good" rubber isolators on the bottom.
In my day job, we mount diesel engines to frames with only isolators on the bottom - no isolator sandwich like on the QL tractors.
Doubt I'd do any of the above, just thinking out loud here - thoughts anyone?
So I've got 8 total "good" original isolators to use when I reinstall the engine on my 1650, and I've got the cradle mod and a cast iron oil pan.
In addition to the "good" original isolators, the tractor came with a set of red/cherry looking hard rubber isolators.
It looks to me like all of the load and isolator damage occurs on the bottom isolator. So the question is - why not use the red/cherry isolator on top of the isolator bracket and the original "good" isolators on the bottom? This would save a "good" set of isolators for use another day down the road.
What about NO isolator on the top - but solid. Still have the "good" rubber isolators on the bottom.
In my day job, we mount diesel engines to frames with only isolators on the bottom - no isolator sandwich like on the QL tractors.
Doubt I'd do any of the above, just thinking out loud here - thoughts anyone?