Well, I made the double "TEE" w/the 2 3/4" dia studs to fit the 3/4" pipe recievers on the mount. I did not have any 3/8" x 3/4 flat so I used 1x1/2" that I did have. The 1" gives a little more bearing area for the shredder body to sit on. more on that later.
Found 2 springs at Theisens that looked to be close to the original wire size and O.D. to the 1 original spring that was still present. The new one was about twice as long so I cut it and used half in each one of the receiver tubes. Re-assembled everything and installed the belt.
The other spring I cut into 2 pieces about 2" long and used those on top of the rear bearing bolts as pictured in the parts look-up along wth a flat washer and a ny-lock nut. These control the tension on the PTO belt which, by the way, is the same as the QA 42 belt. This also kind of automatically aligned the pulleys/sheaves on the shredder/front drive belt.
The receiver was dirty inside so I cleaned it well and put a thin coat of grease on the inside as well as on the 2 pins that slide up and down in the recievers on top of the springs.
PROBLEM: My springs were not strong enough to keep the belt tight enough to keep it from flopping around.
Solution: go to a stronger larger I.D. spring (I bought a couple just in case) wich will require a larger I.D. receiver (1") This mod would only be noticeable by someone "in the know" so to speak, once installed and painted.
Secondary problem: The top edge of the "TEE" rubs on the lower edge/wall/side of the shredder where it rests wearing a gouge in the thin sheet metal used for the body. The sides are only like 1/8" sheet or so. Possible solution would be a short length of 3/4"x3/4" angle, which would provide more bearing surface on the top of the TEE. This could be pinned to the lower screen pin which is just behind the TEE. This angle would have a spot of grease for lube and could be replaced as needed when worn. Better still would be a small piece of semi truck 5th wheel slip plate secured to the top edge of the double TEE. I think I will pursue this mod tomorrow.
This would keep the appearance as close to original as possible and still be useable IMHO.
A good re-pro of the shield would make a presentable piece of machinery IMHO, so Doug, If you would be so kind!!
Thanks Guys!
Found 2 springs at Theisens that looked to be close to the original wire size and O.D. to the 1 original spring that was still present. The new one was about twice as long so I cut it and used half in each one of the receiver tubes. Re-assembled everything and installed the belt.
The other spring I cut into 2 pieces about 2" long and used those on top of the rear bearing bolts as pictured in the parts look-up along wth a flat washer and a ny-lock nut. These control the tension on the PTO belt which, by the way, is the same as the QA 42 belt. This also kind of automatically aligned the pulleys/sheaves on the shredder/front drive belt.
The receiver was dirty inside so I cleaned it well and put a thin coat of grease on the inside as well as on the 2 pins that slide up and down in the recievers on top of the springs.
PROBLEM: My springs were not strong enough to keep the belt tight enough to keep it from flopping around.
Solution: go to a stronger larger I.D. spring (I bought a couple just in case) wich will require a larger I.D. receiver (1") This mod would only be noticeable by someone "in the know" so to speak, once installed and painted.
Secondary problem: The top edge of the "TEE" rubs on the lower edge/wall/side of the shredder where it rests wearing a gouge in the thin sheet metal used for the body. The sides are only like 1/8" sheet or so. Possible solution would be a short length of 3/4"x3/4" angle, which would provide more bearing surface on the top of the TEE. This could be pinned to the lower screen pin which is just behind the TEE. This angle would have a spot of grease for lube and could be replaced as needed when worn. Better still would be a small piece of semi truck 5th wheel slip plate secured to the top edge of the double TEE. I think I will pursue this mod tomorrow.
This would keep the appearance as close to original as possible and still be useable IMHO.
A good re-pro of the shield would make a presentable piece of machinery IMHO, so Doug, If you would be so kind!!
Thanks Guys!