tlavalette
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2015
- Messages
- 87
- displayname
- Tom Lavalette
Why didn't the hydro tractors have a high/low range rear. Especially in the supers.
-
This community needs YOUR help today!
With the ever-increasing fees of maintaining our vibrant community (servers, software, domains, email), we need help.
We need more Supporting Members today.Please invest back into this community to help spread our love and knowledge of all aspects of IH Cub Cadet and other garden tractors.
Why Join?
- Exclusive Access: Gain entry to private forums.
- Special Perks: Enjoy enhanced account features that enrich your experience, including the ability to disable ads.
- Free Gifts: Sign up annually and receive exclusive IH Cub Cadet Tractor Forum decals directly to your door!
This is your chance to make a difference. Become a Supporting Member today:
Why didn't they...?
- Thread starter tlavalette
- Start date
Help Support IH Cub Cadet Forum:
mgonitzke
Well-known member
Because there is no need for it. Hydrostatic transmission speed is infinitely variable between 0 and the maximum speed.
bwstevens
Well-known member
That and it would have cost money to ditch the transmission from the 40's cub. Actually the power plants at that time didn't over power the hydro .
jlord
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2016
- Messages
- 97
- displayname
- Jim Lord
I think a locking differential operated by a heel plunger would be a preferred option, like the kind that the big tractors have. There are times when that would come in handy.
As long as your heel has the plunger depressed, you've got a live axle.
As long as your heel has the plunger depressed, you've got a live axle.
