sblunier
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2006
- Messages
- 4,829
- displayname
- Steve Blunier "Mr. Plow" (Central IL)
Mag 20 has same 3.12" bore as the Mag 18, but a shade over 1/4" more stroke, 2.75" vs. 3.06" which gives it about 5 more cu/in (42.18 vs 46.98). Compression ratio on the 20 is also higher, 6:1 vs. 6.6:1
The stroke and the CR make the 20 lug much better than the 18, a very noticeable difference on a hard drawbar pull like plowing (pushing it, not just loafing along). It's much like the difference between a 14hp K-321 and a 16hp K-341.
Looking down on an 18 and 20, the sheet metal on the jugs is noticeably different...considerably wider on the 20hp, otherwise they are exact twins.
Surprisingly, the Briggs I/C 16hp in the 582 is a very strong puller, in spite of it's larger bore and smaller stroke, it is a real machine in the 582 chassis. While the hydro/gear drive make it an unequal comparison......the engine is surprisingly powerful and smooth, but must be started and warmed up differently than the Kohler, Briggs are always more fussy until warmed up.
The stroke and the CR make the 20 lug much better than the 18, a very noticeable difference on a hard drawbar pull like plowing (pushing it, not just loafing along). It's much like the difference between a 14hp K-321 and a 16hp K-341.
Looking down on an 18 and 20, the sheet metal on the jugs is noticeably different...considerably wider on the 20hp, otherwise they are exact twins.
Surprisingly, the Briggs I/C 16hp in the 582 is a very strong puller, in spite of it's larger bore and smaller stroke, it is a real machine in the 582 chassis. While the hydro/gear drive make it an unequal comparison......the engine is surprisingly powerful and smooth, but must be started and warmed up differently than the Kohler, Briggs are always more fussy until warmed up.